EDU 6945: Content Knowledge (4.2) &
6 Assessment (6.2)
For a teacher to be effective, they need to create a pathway between the learning standard being taught and the lessons used to get students to the standard. This pathway is marked by learning targets and formative assessments. The learning targets break down the standard or learning segment into manageable chunks. Formative assessments then checks to see that the students are on the path and moving toward the learning target.
A learning target written in student-friendly language is a great first step in this process. For a recent learning segment using paired texts, I used a variety of learning targets and formative assessment techniques to check that students were gaining on their objective (to apply a range of strategies to comprehend, construct meaning from, and interpret complex texts verbally, in writing, and by connecting two different texts to construct meaning). I started this unit with a simpler, student-friendly academic language learning target, that being “I can Explain the similarities and differences between two written works on the same topic.” With this learning target, I addressed and discussed with the class what it means to explain, what is involved in the explanation process, such as details and examples. A couple of lessons later, the learning target evolved into, “I can compare and contrast two texts and find text evidence for support.” Again the same essential tasks and skills but now with a higher level of academic language and more exact tasks. Students then explored and discussed what the words “compare” and “contrast” meant in regards to the language arts classroom and in the activities they were engaged.
There were many formative assessments used to check student understandings in this lesson segment. A few of these included partner turn-and-talks in which students were able to discuss ideas and hear others ideas before engaging in a larger group discussion. This gave students a chance to practice using the academic language and discussion techniques/wording in a less formidable situation with the teacher still able to hear and check for understandings. Another formative assessment was listening to small group discussions.The lesson plan states the, “Teacher will conference with each group. Teacher will have selected students summarize their passage verbally for the teacher. Teacher will listen for misinformation and clear up any misconceptions. Teacher will listen to group discussion in response to the text dependent questions. Teacher will be listening and checking answers for evidence from the text.” A third, and perhaps most important assessment, involved that of student voice. Daily exit tickets,such as this, provided students the opportunity to express areas of concern or remaining questions. They also provided a means for me to check for understanding. To know which students were advancing toward or were capable of meeting the learning target, I added a goal to the students learning target. This target stated that students should be able to provide two pieces of evidence from the text for support. This then added a measurable component to the learning target. Students,as well as, myself could then determine their level of success.
A more concrete measure of student capability came at the end of the paired text packet, when the work was turned in for teacher evaluation and feedback. Evaluation and feedback were for these specific areas: 1.) Answers written as complete sentences, 2.) Answer conveys correct information/ideas, 3.) Answer gives evidence from text(s) for support, and 4.) Answer cites text. With this feedback students could better see patterns or areas that they were consistently missing and need to further work on, as well as, feedback on areas they were mastering.
